Home - , , - Lawmakers Urging for Careful Examination of the Merger Between Sprint and T-Mobile

Lawmakers Urging for Careful Examination of the Merger Between Sprint and T-Mobile

By now, it's no longer a secret that T-Mobile and Sprint has plans to merge with each other. Despite their announcement a few months ago, there has not yet been any development to the merger on whether or not it was approved by the FCC and DOJ.

Recently, however, there are reports that lawmakers from the Congress are keen on urging President Donald Trump to carefully examine the proposed merger between the two wireless providers. The report from Bloomberg shows that the lawmakers are worried about Sprint's ties to the Chinese government.

In reality, Sprint does not have a direct connection to Beijing. A more clearer explanation to this is that Sprint is owned majorly by Japan's SoftBank, which has previously worked with Huawei. The reasoning behind the lawmakers' concerns is that the US government has identified the Chinese telecommunications company as a national security threat, alongside ZTE. These two companies have been banned by the Department of Defense (military use of Huawei devices) and the Commerce Department (trade ban on ZTE).

The lawmakers inked a letter, which read:

"Recognizing that these companies operate as subsidiaries of foreign-owned firms-- one of which maintains long-standing close ties with Chinese state-influenced entities -- a full and robust national security investigation is required."

The letter was sent to Steve Mnuchin, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, who is spearheading the national security review of the merger. The letter is currently making the rounds among the House of the Representatives.

The critics wrote that SoftBank is currently working with Huawei to use 5G technology to power service robots in Asia. They believe that with the merger approved, it "would increase telecommunications risks associated with third-party foreign entities, including Huawei, being utilized in the development of US 5G infrastructure."

There has not yet been any response from Mnuchin's part.

Source: The Verge

Tags: , ,


Comment Page :
  1. Without the merger, T-mobile might not have a US 5G ingrastructure.

    That, and the whole guilt by association schtick makes it clear that their sudden protectionist streak is a farce.

    What they really want is to protect the Bell Twins from competition, else Saint Obama wouldn't have allowed Softbank to even buy Sprint in the first place.

  2. I think that the merger should not happen! Prices will increase and competition will decrease. Every merger ultimately causes this net effect.

    1. Yes, note that AT$T was quick to raise prices once they won their court case and were allowed to merge with Time Warner.

Comment Page :

All comments must be approved before they will appear. The following types of comments will not be approved: off topic comments, insults or personal attacks directed at other commenters, bigotry, hate, sexism and profanity.